Supreme Court on Twisha Sharma Case (Image: Internet)
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday heard the case related to the death of actor-model Twisha Sharma and emphasised the need for a fair, independent and impartial investigation. The court also cautioned all parties against turning the matter into a media-driven trial.
The matter came before a bench headed by Chief Justice of India along with Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M. Pancholi, after the court took suo motu cognisance of allegations involving procedural lapses and institutional bias in the investigation.
The bench expressed concern over continuous public discussion of the case, noting that both sides had been approaching the media. It urged restraint, saying the legal process should be allowed to proceed without interference or speculation.
The court also requested media organisations not to rely on statements from either party or publish material that could influence potential witnesses or the ongoing investigation.
During the hearing, senior advocates appearing for the accused raised concerns that statements recorded under Section 161 of the CrPC were appearing in the media shortly after being recorded. The prosecution countered by alleging that public commentary from certain individuals had contributed to the case being sensationalised.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the state, informed the court that the investigation had been recommended for transfer to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
The bench reiterated that the focus must remain on uncovering the truth through a proper investigation. It expressed confidence in both state agencies and the CBI, stating that the case would be taken to its logical conclusion.
The court also urged both families involved to present their statements only before investigating authorities rather than through public platforms.
The court recorded submissions indicating that a second post-mortem had already been completed. It further noted that discussions were underway regarding transferring the investigation to the CBI.
Before concluding, the bench clarified that its observations should not be treated as a comment on the merits of the case and stressed that the investigation must proceed independently without external pressure.
