English
English
English
People have different reactions to the ceasefire between India and Pakistan. In this special report of Dynamite News, know how correct this decision is
Ceasefire between India and Pakistan
New Delhi: India and Pakistan have agreed on ceasefire, and now there is a peace on the international border and the Line of Control. At the same time, there are still many questions in the minds of the people whether the decision of ceasefire was right or not and why US President Trump had to intervene for the ceasefire.
Dynamite News Editor-in-Chief Manoj Tibrewal Akash has tried to answer these questions in his special show. He said in his show that ceasefire was announced between India and Pakistan at 5:37 pm on May 10, which US President Donald Trump has described as a "historic decision".
US President Donald Trump posted on his social media platform and praised the leaders of both India and Pakistan and said that America has played an important role in reaching this turning point.
Donald Trump wrote, "I am happy that the leaders of India and Pakistan reached this agreement with mutual consent. This decision can prevent the death and destruction of millions of people. The courageous step taken by the leaders of both the countries will further strengthen their legacy."
Trump also made a statement about Kashmir and said, "Perhaps after a thousand years, the time has come to find a peaceful solution to this long dispute." However, he also clarified that no formal agreement has been reached on this issue but America wants to work together with both the countries.
India has always opposed any third party mediation or intervention and India has believed from the beginning that the Kashmir dispute is an internal matter of India and only two countries Pakistan and India will resolve it with mutual consent. India has always been in favor of this. But why did Donald Trump deliberately fuel such a thing? This is also a topic of discussion in political circles.
The Indian Government has clarified that this agreement has been reached through direct communication between the two countries. Pakistan Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) made the first call, then the process of conversation started and ceasefire was agreed upon.
Both the Indian Foreign Ministry and Pakistan's Foreign Minister confirmed this agreement.
After the ceasefire, the general public and retired military officers, defense experts and leaders of the ruling party and the opposition of the country are giving their reactions.
While many people are supporting Trump statement that the ceasefire has put an end to the possibilities of the death of millions of people, the loss of life, property or economic loss that could have happened if the war between the two countries had continued for a long time.
Regarding this, the government and the people associated with the government and the supporters of the government consider it a good step. But on the other hand, opposition leaders, a section of the public and many retired army officers are not considering it a proper step. It is being called a hasty step taken by India.
Today, a leading Hindi newspaper of the country has printed the statement of two retired army chiefs of the country. Its title is Questions on sudden ceasefire. Former army chief also surprised by the ceasefire decision.
General BP Malik, who was the chief of the Indian army in 1999 during the Kargil war. Quoting him, the newspaper wrote, history will ask what India achieved from this? Former army chief General Manoj Naravade, who retired some time ago, said that this has happened for the third time. Now we will not get such a golden opportunity again. He says that stopping military action in the sea and sky from 5:00 pm is a welcome step. However, we should respond only after an attack every time and keep losing lives due to terrorism. This method will not work now. This has happened for the third time and now we will not get another chance.
After this decision, a debate has sparked on social media. While many people are calling it a necessary and positive step, some people have called it a "mistake of trusting Pakistan".
“This was a big mistake. They (Pakistan) should be destroyed.”
“Will Pakistan follow the ceasefire? Or is this another betrayal?”
“If this saves the lives of innocent people, then it is a welcome step.”
Many questions are also being raised about the ceasefire, whether Pakistan will follow it permanently? Will this stop infiltration from across the border? And will this decision lay the foundation of permanent peace in the region?
At present, it would be too early to say whether this decision will be effective in the long run or not, but it is certain that this can be called an important diplomatic step between India and Pakistan.
