English
English
English
Can Social Media Platforms Stop CSAM Circulation? Supreme Court Examines Big Question (Img: Google)
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday sought the response of the Centre and other concerned authorities on a plea seeking stringent measures to prevent the circulation of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) through social media, messaging services and other online platforms.
The Bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, along with Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V. Mohana, issued notice on the petition moved by the Just Rights for Children Alliance, which has sought stronger safeguards against the exposure of children to sexually exploitative content in the digital space.
The petitioner has urged the Court to examine whether existing technological and regulatory mechanisms are adequate to detect, block and remove such material before it can be accessed or further disseminated online.
During the hearing, the Bench emphasised the importance of protecting children from harmful digital content. Justice Joymalya Bagchi observed that effective firewalls are necessary for children particularly given the increasing accessibility of online platforms to minors.
The petition raises concerns over the manner in which digital platforms monitor and regulate content generated, uploaded and circulated by users. It seeks greater accountability from intermediaries and calls for the deployment of technological tools capable of identifying and preventing the dissemination of material involving the sexual exploitation of children.
The petition also draws attention to the role of algorithms and automated recommendation systems used by online platforms. It is alleged that such systems can potentially amplify objectionable material by recommending or directing users towards content similar to what they have previously viewed or searched for.
The petitioner has accordingly sought stronger safeguards to ensure that children are not inadvertently exposed to sexually explicit or exploitative material through algorithmic recommendations or inadequate age-control mechanisms.
The proceedings also involve the statutory responsibilities of intermediaries under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 and the Information Technology Act, 2000
The Supreme Court had earlier, examined the obligations of intermediaries in relation to child sexual abuse material. The Court had stressed that intermediaries cannot evade statutory responsibilities concerning the reporting and handling of such material.
The present petition seeks further judicial intervention in the rapidly evolving digital environment, particularly with regard to preventive mechanisms rather than merely remedial action after unlawful content has already been uploaded or circulated.
The petitioner has pressed for a framework that would require online platforms to adopt robust content-detection systems, effective safeguards for minors and mechanisms for prompt reporting and removal of prohibited material.
The plea places before the Supreme Court the larger issue of balancing the technological autonomy of digital intermediaries with their legal and social responsibility to protect children from online sexual exploitation. The Centre's response is now awaited before the Court proceeds further with the matter.
