English
English
English
The United States’ pursuit of Greenland for Arctic security and green technology supply chains has triggered global debate. Denmark and the EU oppose the move, emphasizing Greenland’s autonomy and rejecting any idea of its annexation.
Trump seeks Greenland for Arctic security.
Washington: The United States’ recent push to secure Greenland has drawn international attention, sparking debates over Arctic security, green technology resources, and global strategic dominance. President Donald Trump, emphasizing national security interests, appointed Jeff Landry, Louisiana’s governor, as a special envoy to Greenland on December 22, 2025. Trump has repeatedly stressed Greenland’s strategic importance, warning about the presence of Russian and Chinese ships along its coasts.
The move has been firmly rejected by both Denmark and Greenland. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and Greenlandic Premier Jens-Frederik Nielsen issued a joint statement, stating, “You cannot annex another country. Not even with an argument about international security.” Danish officials have criticized the US approach as unacceptable, warning that Greenland’s autonomy must be respected.
Top European Union officials have expressed solidarity with Denmark and Greenland, highlighting concerns over the US’s intentions in the Arctic. The EU has opposed the idea of the United States acquiring Greenland, reflecting broader worries about stability in global governance and the strategic balance in the Arctic region.
Turkey: Six ISIS militants killed in police operation; Three officers dead
Greenland, the world’s largest island, has a population of around 57,000, with four-fifths of its landmass covered by ice. It occupies a critical location between North America and Europe, making it highly significant for military and economic strategy. Greenland hosts the Pituffik Space Base, one of the United States’ most important military installations, historically crucial during the Cold War and still vital for Arctic operations today.
President Trump has repeatedly highlighted Greenland’s strategic and security value. In March 2025, Vice President JD Vance stated, “We do not think that military force is ever going to be necessary, we think this makes sense.” Trump also argued that Greenland’s natural resources and position in the Arctic are essential for US interests. This approach aligns with his previous proposals to purchase Greenland during his first term, underscoring his long-term strategic vision.
The Greenland gambit is part of a broader pattern in US foreign policy under Trump, including aggressive stances toward Venezuela, critiques of European allies, and shifts in national security policy. These moves, combined with Trump’s controversial references in international files, are expected to keep global politics fluid in 2026. European leaders are supportive of a US presence in Greenland but remain cautious about intentions, signaling potential diplomatic friction in the coming year.
